If 2 teams are on level points at the end of the season,how will the postions be decided?

in la liga its head to head.so how is it in the epl.....if chelsea and man u are on level points or man city and tottenham ?If 2 teams are on level points at the end of the season,how will the postions be decided?
Then the different of goal is counted(No of goal score - no of goal conceded)


the team with better different of goal get the top placeIf 2 teams are on level points at the end of the season,how will the postions be decided?
it goes on goal difference and then if that is the same i think it goes on who ever won more games
In England, it's pretty straight forward. Better goal difference.


Frankly, that's the way it suppose to be.





A team should be measure through the whole season. And not just about two games. Every club goes through injuries, suspensions and harsh refereeing decisions. Measuring just the head to head record only means who was better on the day.
In the EPL it goes like this...





1. Goal difference


2. Goals scored (most goals scored finishes ahead)


3. Playoff at neutral venue to decide winner

hair bands

windows web server

For people born transsexual do you want society to accept you as ';transsexuals';, or as ordinary men and women?

It seems like a catch 22 if you ask me.





On one hand, for transsexual people who have not changed I can see how not being discriminated against would be very important. At the same time, people who are changing (I assume) are trying to be seen as ordinary men and women. So by demanding rights as ';transsexuals';, isn't that causing people to look at you as the one thing you are trying to NOT be seen as?





Are there transsexual people who actually want to be seen as ';transsexuals'; even after they change? Why would someone want this? I mean, why would someone bother to change if they didn't want to be seen as regular man or woman? I don't get it???For people born transsexual do you want society to accept you as ';transsexuals';, or as ordinary men and women?
If I had been a transsexual, *I* sure would have wanted for people to just see me as my preferred gender after I had gone through transition. Wouldn't you..?





Sure, it would be fine if they ALSO knew about my past. But it would be difficult if that somehow prevented them from seeing me as ';fully male'; or ';fully female';. (Whatever it was that I had transitioned to.)





By the way: when you say they ';demand transsexual rights';, what exactly is it that you're referring to? Hate crime legislation? I think that's fine, considering they are part of a much hated minority. Unfortunately, people who have gone through a sex change tend to be harassed more frequently than the average cisgendered person. So if they're attacked for that very reason, just due to people being hateful and fearful, of course it should be punished.For people born transsexual do you want society to accept you as ';transsexuals';, or as ordinary men and women?
Exactly how a transperson identifies themselves socially, depends on the transperson. I've heard some FtMs say ';I'm not one of those transguys who says 'I was never a woman', that's bull. I was a woman, for 20 years. I wasn't happy, but I was a woman. I consider myself a transguy, not male or female, but FtM.'; I've also heard transguys say ';I'm a man. I don't think that your body parts should define whether you are a man or not. I don't have any plans on transitioning because I'm comfortable in my body. I don't need surgery or hormones to feel like a man.'; I've also heard transguys say ';In order for me to feel like a complete man, I need to have hormones an surgery. I won't feel like a complete man until I have a dick.';


Every single transperson will give you a different answer. There isn't one correct answer, because the answers are about how they view themselves, and how they feel.


Some transpeople may identify as ';transsexual';. Others may choose to be out under the label of transsexual, so they can change peoples perceptions of transpeople, whether they identify as male, female, or transsexual.





I also fail to see how pushing for legislation that means people can't deny you jobs or housing because you are transsexual, is labeling yourself as transsexual. It's demanding not to be viewed differently, but as a human with rights.
I want to be seen as an ordinary woman but that does not keep me from wanting to be protected from having people kill me because I was born with a birth defect. Wanting not to be tortured or murdered is not some ';special right'; you get it also.
I am so, so ashamed of my birth gender, so no, i don't want to be refered to as a transsexual
I am a woman.





I am a healthcare worker and work with the public in direct patient care every day. I can assure you that all my patients see is the woman that's there to help care for them.





Legal protections are needed because in this Information Age computer databases make it so that many people can discover our private medical histories. And once they know many people discriminate. The problem isn't us. The problem is ignorance on the part of society at large.








edit: The Human Right Campaign says:





Chances you are murdered in your lifetime... 1:18,000





Chances I am murdered because I'm transsexual 1:12





People discriminate, sometimes violently so.
Transsexualism is a birth condition, it is not an identity.





I am a WOMAN, I may have been born with transsexualism but I am a WOMAN.
I suppose one must accept the minor humiliation of sociological categorization in order to appropriate the freedoms and abilities of that class.





Of course, not everyone is phobically afraid of being labeled according to their history.

Why do Italians pride themselves in wooing women ?

How come Italian men( not Americans but Europeans) are so flamboyant when it comes to chasing women ?





They are so good at writing love letters, excessive compliments and BSing woman with their ';showmance'; The romantic show they put on just to look cool in front of others.





I encountered few Italians and they all behave in similar ways with the ridiculous compliments and exaggerated sense of romantic love.





Is this cultural ? Do the behave this way to compete and outdo other men ??Why do Italians pride themselves in wooing women ?
they seduce and manipulateWhy do Italians pride themselves in wooing women ?
yes, it's cultural. moreover, i believe that once it became enshrined in movies and books and so on, and became part of the stereotype of italian men, compared to others, it became like a self-fulfilling prophecy. now they have to live up to the stereotype.
idk but it's retarded. those sexy bastards...
ahahaha yeah probably it's culture..... i don't know maybe it's just because italians care ladies more than others

Why should the oppress women(and men) in past affect the clueless men(and women) in the present?

are men in the present suppose to get punishment for what men have done in the past?








how would war crimes? should germans italians and japanese do anything?Why should the oppress women(and men) in past affect the clueless men(and women) in the present?
The son should not be punished for the sin of his father, it's somewhere in the Bible.Why should the oppress women(and men) in past affect the clueless men(and women) in the present?
It shouldn't we as humans should look to our convictions and our lifes rather than wallow in misery.





Hisotry is brilliant, but thinking it should control now is naive.
I know. Considering that half of your ancestors were female, that should make you (and every other male) the victims of past female oppression also.








And considering the fact that every woman alive has male ancestors, then that would make her responsible for the oppression caused by her male ancestors -- especially since she benefited from the monetary support that her father gave her as the result of his oppression of others.
the son punished for the sins of the father. translation ...there are consequences that will affect your family for generations.





The consequences are natural consequences. example..father goes to prison for murder...family will suffer social problems that affect the quality of life negatively. ( not everyone is kind, understanding and non judgmental, even though we know that's what is right.)





They may have to relocate, costing money, job, and support of family or friends, the live in dread of being found out...





next generation grows up with fear, shame, sorrow, maybe poverty, this effects their life as well...and so on... you get the idea.
I agree I don't think you can judge past generations simply because you'll be talking out of your ****.
aside from learning from the mistakes of the past so as not to repeat them, no other reason.





but my guess is it actually goes so as to continue repeating them forever.





makes for a more controllable race that way.
They shouldn't but we should realise how many of these attitudes have got into our language which is the only way we can think and they still affect people today because we simply accept things as normal which should be challenged and rejected - racial stereotypes, gender values etc etc.We don't know we do it! It means women and black, Asian, gay etc people can be disadvantaged at work and in other ways - you are much more likely to be diagnosed as mentally ill if you are black, Irish or female, you are more likely to be seen as threatening if you are black, seen as unreliable as an employee if female.





If we are not aware of this we perpetuate it. I was ashamed to find I felt nervous when walking home from the station late at night and a young black bloke was the only person to get off the train with me. There was nothing in his behaviour to make me feel like that and I'm sure I wouldn't have been nervous if he was white. Of course, he was no threat at all. I was really surprised as well as ashamed because I had no idea that prejudice was inside me. Now I do know I can tackle it and get rid of it.
no


the only reason history should be remembered is to learn from our mistakes and make the world a better place for you and for me and the entire human race....Michel jackson much!!:P

How do I tell this kid I don't want to kiss him anymore?

Okay, so ive known phil* for a while and i have to admit, for a while i have been attracted to him. He's kind of a man wh*re so i told myself that i wouldn't go out with him. Well i kinda might have promised to kiss him about two weeks ago.





So here's the problem..


Over sprink break(last week) i met a guy that i really like. I really feel like i shouldnt kiss this other guy anymore, as not to lead him on, but i still want to be his friend.





So how do i tell this guy that i promised to kiss that i feel like i shouldn't anymore by letting him down easily for me?How do I tell this kid I don't want to kiss him anymore?
Just say that you dont feel comfortable kissing him. You dont have to kiss someone if you dont want to even if you promised. Its your choice. If he's nice, he'll understand, if he doesnt, then you shouldnt want to stay friends with himHow do I tell this kid I don't want to kiss him anymore?
I would slow down for a few weeks to sort out your emotions. Evaluate in each individual their positives and negatives, and then make a choice. There needs to be a definitive line drawn in the sand here soon as to which guy you want to pursue a relationship with. Remember you've known ';Phil'; longer than the other guy, and it will take the same amount of time to be sure of the other guy.
Tell this phil kid that you're not going to kiss him.


Like...


Him: ';You owe me that kiss!';


You: ';I'm not going to kiss you!'; (said jokingly-sounding, but really you're not)





Say you were kidding, or didn't think he was actually serious.


Or tell him you have a boyfriend (because, it sounds like you almost do).
Tell him you didn't think he was serious and it was just a joke that you don't want to kiss him because it will ruin your friendship and you value the friendship more than some meaningless kiss.
Tell him that you just want to be friends. If he has any ounce of real respect for you he will understand.
tell him that you just wanna be friends
come out with it that's it cuz anything else you do will just make it woes

How was australian rules football created?

It looks like a wussy sport compared to american football where real men compete.How was australian rules football created?
Wussy? Um NO!How was australian rules football created?
loser
Born out of Irish Gaelic Football. Not as good as Rugby League and played by Victorians
it was created so wnkers like you could compete at soccer
Australian Rules football was created probably from 4 main sources:





1. It could have come from Ireland, and Irish schoolchildren who had been transported


2. It could have come from English Great Public School games like rugby football


3. It could have been inspired by traditional indigenous aboriginal games like Marn Grook


4. It could be all of the above and then some.





As for it being wussy, in American football, the average player runs a little over 3 miles in 60 minutes of actual game play. In Australian Rules, players can run up to 14 miles in matches which can last anywhere from 100 minutes to 129 minutes of actual game time.





If American footballers are so tough, then why do they need all that padding? Jason Dunstall played most of the 1990 season with a fractured skull.


Get that up ya. How many American Footballers play on with a broken skull eh? Wuss bags.
wussy actually sounds like the type of bloke who would wear a helmet
I don't see any of those toughboys coming here and cutting it in our sport. But the other way round.....
It was instigated by Scottish %26amp; Irish migrants.





It was always a bit too rough %26amp; tough for the Australian born populace of men at the time. It has taken several generations for home born Australians to adapt to the game - this has been brought about by the softening of the rules %26amp; having the rough %26amp; tumble taken out.
Guys you just have to ignore idiots like this. All he's trying to do is to get you going. As an American who has lived in Australia, I love Footy and I love American Football. To compare the two sports is totally useless, they are too totally different games from each other. I sit up in the middle of the nights on weekends watching the AFL and being a Richmond fan for over 30 years it's tough staying up at 4.30am and watching your team get beat by 60+ points every week. The tackling in American football is different from footy because they lead with their heads where as in Footy they tackle with the shoulders and the chest. The reason for the helmets is because back in the 30's football was going to be outlawed due to all the deaths that occurred. Footy is a rough sport, American football is a violent sport. Both games are great to watch and should be enjoyed. The only problem we have in Footy and we should able to admit this as Footy fans is, due to the high amount of scoring there is an over abundance of blowout games, the average score so this year is 107.7 to 71.4 a 36 point difference. So just ignore the ignorance of people who have to put down another sport to help themselves feel better about their game. And pray for my Tigers to win at least ONE game this year, I have secumbed to the point the we have won the wooden spoon after week five, so light a candle for me the next time you are in church.

My fiance wants to have sex before marriage. What to do?

I'm 21 and don't believe in saving it for marriage. I want to try it with my fiance before we get married. I don't want someone bad in bed. Marriage is all about sex. Most women my age wouldn't marry a man who never had sex or no experience, not in this era.





If he won't break his principals, then I'll have to call off the engagement and find another man.





How can I get him to break those principles?My fiance wants to have sex before marriage. What to do?
Sex is the highest in the marriage relationship; it is a symbol of faith. So avoid having sex before marriage.My fiance wants to have sex before marriage. What to do?
I understand your point of view. Despite what anyone says sex is not all about the marriage, but a big huge part too. You both have a right to know what is to be expected. Many cultures have a ritual called ';bundling'; where the engaged couple can sleep together without actually having sexual intercourse. I will be honest and frank with you. It sounds like he is not being considerate for your wants and needs. Does he ever talk about sex? Do you ever experiment with playful touching? If he is reluctant and only wants to talk about sex only after marriage, that is a warning sign. Sex in a marriage is all about consideration mutually. There are many deep subjects that need to be in the open like what you both like in bed together. No one likes surprises and that is why many Churches have premarital counseling and also secular counsel too. I know from experience as an elder lady that both need to know all about each other and the pillow talk needs to be in the open with both of you before the Big Day.
This is why sex should wait until after marriage, you both have an even start so there are no comparisons. If the choice of partner was a good one sex will be something that each person wants to make sure the other is enjoying. Many many marriages end not because of bad sex but because the wrong choice of partner was made.





If this man has principals and you do not agree with them and want to try and make him break them, YOU HAVE THE WRONG MAN. You two will have other basic opposing thoughts and ideas. You do not respect his point of view. You don't want to marry someone and then find out they are bad in bed. This is not a good reason to base a marriage on. If you are still a virgin I think you should wait for marriage. It will add something immeasurable to your marriage. Many women wish that they had waited. Perhaps this is what your future husband wants for you both. If you need to check out the goods and he wants to wait, then you must respect that and wait, If it were you that wanted to wait and him that wanted to pressure you into sex everyone here would be saying for you not to give up your principals and that he does not respect your values. You should respect that or let go of this man so he can find someone more compatible.
If that's how you feel, you should just not get married. Relationships and marriage is not about sex. Sex is just an activity that could be fun together, but is merely a perk. If it is important to you, you should just be single, not sure why you'd want to be married.





If he doesn't want to, then he doesn't have to. If that's not good for you, then be fair to him and break it off. Seems like he'd be better off without you if you think in such little a way.
SAVE IT... if you love him, you would wait for him and not pressure. and marriage is not all about sex, its also about commitment, trust, friendship, love, and being together. if your only in it for sex, you need to break it off anyway





P.S. im also not one of those prudes who save it for marriage but i believe you should respect his principles
PLEASE do not be the idiot that you sound like and have sex with that man before you get married. Marriage is NOT all about sex and even if it was..it's a learning experience for both the man and the woman. I'm 19 and I would marry a man with no sex experience. Seriously...don't do it. It ain't worth it. For all you know you could get stood up at the altar and left with a broken heart...don't give no man your roses until they've committed their life to you first...
Wow. You are the reason the divorce rate is so high in this country. I feel bad for the man you are with. You're supposed to love someone for who they are, not how good they are in bed. So what if he turns out to be bad? At least you married a man who can make you smile on your worst days. Don't make him break his promise to himself.
marriage is not all about sex. I have never met one person in my entire life that divorced over sex.


One night stands are all about sex. BUt a marriage is a team.. common goals.. it's a partnership. best friends.. a companion for the rest of your life. Having sex and children are a benefit of that partnership. NOT the sole reason for it!!!
first, marriage isn't all about sex or divorce rates would be a lot lower because you could solve all problems w/ a good roll in the hay.


second, it sounds like youre still too immature for marriage.


third, i think pre-marital sex is a requirement.
Just tell him Straight up what you want to do, if he loves you than sex can wait til you say I Do, if not than hes not the right one and you know what he really wanted out of the relationship and it wasn't love





Hope it help :)


And good luck
Marriage is NOT all about sex, but anyways... if you two don't see eye to eye on something like sex, it can be fixed if one of you is willing to stop being so damn selfish.
Im confused, either way, if you both really loved each other you would both respect each others opinions etc
Call off the engagement... If you truely love him why try to make him do something he doesn't believe in? Find someone who shares your views on this particular topic.


Good Luck to you!
prepare one hot skillet and put it right between you's and then take it out the day of your honeymoon
This has to be a joke.
He is not going to buy the cow if you let him milk it for free....

hair bands

shared web hosting